Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-60 vs VW T-Cross

Key Differences

Four significant differences stand out from the comparison:

• With the seats folded down, the trunk of the Mazda CX‑60 is 11 in (+19%) longer than that of the VW T‑Cross.
• With the first row of seats upright, the Mazda even offers 12.6 in (+48%) more length.
• The width of the trunk opening of the Mazda is 4.3 in (+11%) larger than that of the T‑Cross.
• The depth (distance from loading edge → trunk floor) is 6.3 in (+1500%) greater in the VW T‑Cross — meaning a significantly deeper loading recess/threshold compared to the Mazda.

Implications for Usability

The longer cargo areas of the Mazda (both with folded seats and with the seat row upright) make it significantly more practical for long or bulky items (e.g., slats, skis, long furniture parts) — especially in everyday use when the seats are not fully folded down.

The larger opening width also makes loading wider items easier and reduces the need to angle them.

The T‑Cross, on the other hand, shows a significantly deeper loading recess. Practically, this means more lifting effort is required when placing heavy items inside, and bulky, flat items are harder to slide over the loading edge.

A deeper cargo well can sometimes provide a more secure hold for luggage, but it is less back-friendly and less flexible in handling than the nearly flat solution of the Mazda.

Smaller differences (e.g., opening height +2.4 in in the Mazda, loading edge height +1.2 in, narrowest width +4%) exist but only slightly affect everyday usability.