Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: Mercedes Benz GLE vs VW Golf Wagon (Mk5)

Trunk comparison: Mercedes Benz GLE vs VW Golf Wagon (Mk5)

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Mercedes Benz GLE and VW Golf Wagon (Mk5)
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Mercedes Benz GLE and VW Golf Wagon (Mk5)

Key Differences

The trunk length of both models is the same when the first row of seats is upright.

However, folding down the rear seats, the Mercedes‑Benz GLE offers +9.4 in (14%) more cargo length than the VW Golf 5. The height of the GLE's trunk opening is +2.8 in (9%) larger, but this difference is under 10% and thus less significant.

The narrowest trunk width of the GLE is only +2 in (5%) larger, and the opening width +3.5 in (9%) — both also under 10% difference.

Two other notable larger deviations are: the depth of the cargo area (loading edge to trunk floor) is +2 in (400%) greater in the VW Golf 5 than in the GLE, and the loading edge of the Mercedes‑Benz GLE sits +5.1 in (20%) higher above the road than in the VW Golf 5.

Impact on Usability

More cargo length with folded seats in the GLE (+9.4 in / 14%): Practically, this means longer items (e.g., slats, furniture parts, skis) can be more easily accommodated in the GLE. With the front seats upright, there is no advantage since the base length is the same.

Higher loading edge in the GLE (+5.1 in / 20%): The higher loading edge makes loading heavy or bulky items more strenuous — you have to lift higher. For regular loading of heavy cargo or for people with limited strength, the Golf 5 is therefore more practical.

Greater depth in the Golf 5 (+2 in / 400%): The Golf has a deeper trunk floor relief behind the loading edge, making the volume below the loading edge more usable.

This is advantageous for storing items deeper and more securely but can mean when loading that items must first be lifted over the loading edge and then set down. Combined with the Golf’s lower loading edge, this often results in easier access to the trunk floor overall.

Width and opening height (differences <10%): Slightly better values in the GLE at the narrowest point (+2 in) and in opening width (+3.5 in) as well as the +2.8 in higher opening height offer minor advantages when loading wider or taller items but are less decisive in everyday use than the larger differences mentioned.

Conclusion: The GLE clearly has the advantage for transporting long items with folded seats. The Golf 5 scores with more practical loading characteristics for heavy or deeply stowable loads (lower loading edge, deeper cargo well).

Which option fits better depends on typical transport tasks: long, flat loads → GLE; frequent lifting/regular daily transport or easier floor access → Golf 5.