Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: Nissan Rogue Sport vs Peugeot 3008

Trunk comparison: Nissan Rogue Sport vs Peugeot 3008

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Nissan Rogue Sport and Peugeot 3008
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Nissan Rogue Sport and Peugeot 3008

Key Differences (>10%)

Peugeot 3008: +4.7 in (14%) longer trunk with front seats upright — with the rear seats occupied, the 3008 offers significantly more length for long items than the Qashqai.

Peugeot 3008: +2 in (83%) greater depth (distance from loading edge → trunk floor) — the 3008 has a noticeably deeper cargo volume below the loading edge.

Impact on Usability

The longer trunk of the 3008 with the seats upright makes it more practical when regularly transporting long items without folding down the rear seats (e.g., skis, long packages).

When folding the seats down, the lengths are practically the same (only +0.8 in/1% in favor of the 3008), so there is no relevant advantage in total cargo volume.

The significantly greater depth in the 3008 increases usable vertical volume and helps place cargo deeper and thus more stably. Combined with the 3008's loading edge being +1.2 in higher, this means heavy lifting over a higher threshold can be more strenuous.

Lighter, bulky, or stackable items benefit from the depth; bulky, heavy loads might be easier to load and unload in the Qashqai.

Other, Smaller Differences (≤10%)

The Nissan Qashqai has a trunk opening that is 3.9 in (10%) wider (an advantage when loading bulky widths) and at the narrowest point an interior width that is 1.2 in (3%) greater.

The height of the trunk opening is 0.8 in (3%) larger in the Qashqai. These differences are practically noticeable but less decisive than the points highlighted above.