Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: Nissan Rogue Sport vs Skoda Octavia Wagon

Trunk comparison: Nissan Rogue Sport vs Skoda Octavia Wagon

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Nissan Rogue Sport and Skoda Octavia Wagon
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Nissan Rogue Sport and Skoda Octavia Wagon

Key Differences

The Škoda Octavia Wagon offers significantly longer loading options: with the seats folded down, the trunk is 21 cm (13 %) longer, and with the first row upright, it is 22 cm (25 %) longer than in the Nissan Rogue Sport.

The depth from the load floor to the loading edge is 4 cm (67 %) greater in the Škoda.

In contrast, the Nissan has a trunk opening that is 2 cm (3 %) higher, a loading edge 13 cm (20 %) higher above the road, and at the narrowest point an interior width that is 4 cm (4 %) larger; the width of the trunk opening is 9 cm (9 %) larger in the Nissan.

Impact on Usability

Because the Škoda offers significantly more space in length and depth, it is better suited for transporting long items (e.g., furniture parts, long packages) and provides overall more flexible loading options, both with folded and upright rear seats.

The greater depth makes it easier to load bulky items and improves space utilization for tall or elongated cargo.

The Nissan scores with a higher loading edge (+13 cm), which makes lifting heavy items more difficult — for frequent loading and unloading of large loads or for people with limited strength, the Škoda is more comfortable due to the lower loading edge.

The slightly higher trunk opening of the Nissan (+2 cm) and the larger opening width (+9 cm) can facilitate loading wider but not very long items; however, the overall shorter loading floor and lesser depth limit how much long cargo can be practically transported.

The slightly larger narrowest interior width of the Nissan (+4 cm) offers only a marginal advantage when fitting wider items.