Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: Nissan Rogue Sport vs Tesla Model Y

Trunk comparison: Nissan Rogue Sport vs Tesla Model Y

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Nissan Rogue Sport and Tesla Model Y
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Nissan Rogue Sport and Tesla Model Y

Key Differences (Highlight >10%)

Tesla Model Y: The trunk is significantly longer — +11.4 in (18%) with the seats folded down and even +9.4 in (28%) when the first row of seats is upright. This means more usable loading length for long items.

Nissan Qashqai: The trunk opening is higher and wider: the opening height is +4.3 in (16%) greater and the width of the trunk opening is +4.3 in (11%) larger. Additionally, the depth (loading edge to trunk floor) of the Qashqai is +2.4 in (500%) greater — more vertical space behind the loading edge.

Impact on Usability

The Tesla Model Y is better suited for loading long, flat items (e.g., slats, long furniture parts, surfboards) because the usable loading length is significantly greater — this applies both with folded seats and with the first row upright.

However, the shallower depth and narrower/lower opening limit handling very tall or bulky cargo.

The Nissan Qashqai scores when transporting wide and tall, bulky or cumbersome items: the larger opening height and width as well as the deeper loading floor offer more vertical and lateral usability. This makes loading boxes, luggage, or bulky household items easier.

On the other hand, there is a higher loading edge (2.8 in higher), making heavy lifting somewhat more strenuous; the greater depth can also mean that heavy items must be overcome when pushing in, rather than sliding in easily.

Conclusion: For long, flat cargo, the Model Y is more practical. For wider, taller, or bulkier items and more flexible space for everyday loading tasks, the Qashqai is often better suited — albeit with a bit more physical effort when lifting due to the higher loading edge.