Trunk comparison: Opel Grandland vs Skoda Kamiq

Key Differences

The Opel Grandland offers a trunk length that is +5.9 in (20%) longer with the rear seat upright compared to the Škoda Kamiq. Additionally, the loading height (load edge above the road) of the Grandland is +3.1 in (11%) higher than that of the Kamiq.

Other differences (not exceeding 10%) include: with the seats fully folded down, the Grandland is +6.3 in (10%) longer, the trunk opening of the Kamiq is +1.2 in (4%) higher, the depth (load edge to trunk floor) is the same, the narrowest width in the trunk is +0.8 in (2%) greater in the Grandland, and the width of the trunk opening is +2.4 in (6%) larger in the Grandland.

Impact on Usability

The 20% longer loading length with the rear seat upright makes the Grandland noticeably more practical for long items or larger luggage when passengers must remain in the back seats (e.g., skis, long boxes, furniture parts).

The 10% longer cargo space with the seats folded down also increases the maximum storage volume but is less significant compared to the 20% difference.

The 11% higher load edge of the Grandland means that lifting heavy or bulky loads into the trunk requires more effort than with the Kamiq. For frequent loading and unloading of heavy items or for users with limited strength, the Kamiq is therefore more practical.

The 4% higher trunk opening of the Kamiq slightly facilitates loading very tall items but is only relevant in very specific loading scenarios.

Width and depth differences are minor (≤6%) and hardly affect everyday usability; the Grandland has slight advantages in width and opening size, which makes loading wider items somewhat easier.

Summary

If the priority is on loading length and maximum cargo space (especially with passengers on the rear seat), the Opel Grandland is more advantageous. If frequent, low-effort loading and unloading or better accessibility of the load edge are important, the Škoda Kamiq is the more practical choice.