Trunk comparison: Peugeot 3008 vs Volvo XC60

Key Differences (highlighted: >10%)

The Peugeot 3008 has a significantly greater trunk depth (distance loading edge → trunk floor) – by 4.3 in or stated as +1000% compared to the Volvo XC60. Additionally, the loading edge of the Peugeot is 3.1 in (≈11%) higher above the ground than that of the Volvo.

What are the implications for usability?

The greater trunk depth in the Peugeot means more space vertically behind the loading edge: bulky or tall items can be stored deeper and thus often more stably.

However, this results in a disadvantage when loading: items must be lifted or reached further down, making the stowing of heavy loads less comfortable. This is especially a drawback for frequent loading and unloading or for users with limited mobility (e.g., elderly people).

The 3.1 in higher loading edge of the Peugeot amplifies this effect: lifting suitcases, shopping bags, or furniture parts requires more effort, and rolling luggage must be lifted over a higher threshold instead of simply rolled in.

For users who frequently load heavy or large items, this is a relevant comfort disadvantage; for occasional users or when loading aids (ramps, trolleys) are used, the disadvantage is less significant.

Other differences (not >10%)

The Volvo XC60 offers a slightly larger loading area in length with the seats folded down (+4.3 in, 7%), and it is about 3.9 in (10%) wider than the Peugeot at the narrowest point and at the trunk opening — this makes sliding in wide items easier.

With the first row of seats upright, the Peugeot has slightly more trunk length in front (+1.2 in, 3%). The trunk opening of the Peugeot is about 1.6 in (5%) higher, which can somewhat facilitate loading tall items.

Practical conclusion

In short: The Peugeot 3008 offers more volume due to its greater trunk depth and can store items high/stably, but the significantly higher loading edge brings noticeable ergonomic disadvantages when loading.

The Volvo XC60 scores with more width in the opening and narrow points, which makes loading wide items easier, and the lower loading edge height makes lifting overall more comfortable.

Which option fits better depends on typical use: lots of volume and infrequent, planned loading → Peugeot; frequent handling of heavy or wide items → Volvo.