Trunk comparison: Peugeot 3008 vs VW Polo

Core Differences and Impact on Usability

The Peugeot 3008 offers significantly more cargo space and a more flexible loading opening: with the seats folded down, the trunk of the 3008 is 11.4 in (21%) longer, and with the first row of seats upright, even 13 in (50%) longer than the VW Polo.

This makes the 3008 noticeably more practical for long or bulky items (e.g., furniture parts, skis, long boxes) and for situations where seat rows need to be used flexibly.

The trunk opening of the 3008 is 3.5 in (13%) higher than that of the Polo, and the opening width is 3.9 in (11%) larger, making it easier to load taller and wider items.

The measured trunk depth (loading edge to floor) is 1.2 in (38%) greater, which, together with the larger opening, provides more usable volume for stackable or tall cargo.

A limitation for loading and unloading heavy loads is the 3.9 in (14%) higher loading edge above the road in the Peugeot, which makes lifting into the trunk more strenuous than in the Polo with its lower loading edge.

The narrowest width in the trunk is only slightly more favorable in the Polo (+0.4 in / 1%) and is practically negligible.

Conclusion: Those who frequently transport long, tall, or wide items or need flexible interior configurations benefit from the Peugeot 3008. Those who mainly load smaller, heavy items and value a lower loading edge will find the VW Polo offers a somewhat more comfortable entry and loading point but at the cost of significantly less space and flexibility.