Trunk comparison: Peugeot 308 SW 3-row vs Durchschnitt Subcompact

Key Differences

The Peugeot 308 SW offers with folded seats +6.7 in (+13%) more cargo length and with the first row upright even +17.7 in (+71%) more length than the average subcompact. In the opposite condition (all seats upright), however, the average subcompact has +11 in (+80%) more trunk volume than the Peugeot.

Regarding trunk geometry, the opening width of the Peugeot is clearly advantageous: +8.7 in (+24%) wider opening.

In contrast, the depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor is significantly greater in the average: +5.9 in (+375%). Additionally, the loading edge in the average sits +6.7 in (+30%) higher above the road than in the Peugeot.

Impact on Usability

For long or bulky cargo (e.g., slats, long boxes, skis), the Peugeot is clearly advantageous due to the greater cargo length with folded seats and with the first row upright — it offers more usable length and a significantly wider opening, which facilitates loading and fitting large items.

For regular luggage in everyday use (suitcases, shopping, stroller with seats upright), the average subcompact is more advantageous because it has significantly more usable trunk space with upright seats (+80%).

For heavy items, the lower loading edge of the Peugeot has a positive effect: shorter lever paths when lifting, easier loading.

In contrast, the average offers more "depth" in the cargo area (greater distance loading edge → floor), thus more vertical storage space under the hatch — useful when volume below the opening is needed.

Conclusion: The Peugeot 308 SW is better for long and wide cargo as well as easy loading due to the wider opening and lower loading edge. The average subcompact scores with pure volume with upright seats and through the greater depth of the cargo area.