Trunk comparison: Peugeot 5008 vs Durchschnitt Wagon
Significant Differences (>10%)
The most noticeable deviations concern the volume with the rear seats upright, the trunk geometry, and the usable width. The average wagon offers a cargo space that is
longer in the "all seats upright" condition than the Peugeot 5008. Additionally, the depth (loading edge to trunk floor) is
greater in the average wagon, indicating a significantly lower loading floor. In favor of the Peugeot 5008, the narrowest point of the trunk is
wider than in the average wagon.
Implications for Usability
Because the average wagon offers a significantly longer cargo space with the rear seats upright, it is better suited for everyday use when all seats are regularly occupied and large or long items need to be transported (strollers, longer packages, bulky groceries). The greater depth of the wagon also means more usable volume below the loading edge: smaller cargo can be stowed deeper and more compactly, noticeably increasing total capacity with normal seating. Combined, this usually results in an easier and more ergonomic loading process for heavy items in the wagon, as more space is available under the loading edge. The Peugeot 5008, on the other hand, scores with a greater width at the narrowest point: wide boxes, sports equipment, or bulky items can often be loaded crosswise or without repositioning more easily in the 5008. This makes the 5008 more flexible for wide but not necessarily very long cargo. Overall, the 5008 is better suited for transports where cross-section/volume is more important than maximum length with occupied seats; the wagon clearly has the advantage when as much longitudinal cargo space as possible is needed with full occupancy.
Other, Smaller Differences
Some deviations are
10% and have less practical impact: the Peugeot 5008 has slight advantages with folded seats and trunk opening (+9% each), and the opening height is nearly identical (+1%). The loading edge of the 5008 is 2.4 in higher, which makes lifting heavy loads somewhat more difficult, but this is just below the 10% threshold and thus a secondary factor.