Trunk comparison: Renault Austral vs Seat Tarraco

Key Differences

In the comparison of trunk dimensions, four clear differences stand out: The SEAT Tarraco offers a cargo area that is +10.6 in (≈17%) longer with the seats folded down than the Renault Austral. With the first row of seats upright, the advantage is even greater: the Tarraco is +10.2 in (≈30%) longer.

The trunk opening height of the Tarraco is +3.9 in (≈14%) higher than that of the Austral. In contrast, the Renault Austral has a significantly greater depth between the loading edge and the trunk floor, namely +0.8 in (≈33%) more than the Tarraco.

Smaller differences in loading edge height (+1.2 in/4%) and width (+2–1.2 in/2–3%) are comparatively insignificant.

Impact on Usability

These differences clearly affect everyday usability: The Tarraco is better suited for long or bulky items and for loading large volumes lengthwise — thanks to the significantly greater usable length (both with folded seats and with the first row upright), longer furniture parts, skis, or multiple suitcases fit more easily.

The higher trunk opening also facilitates loading tall or bulky items (e.g., plant pots, boxes, strollers).

The Austral scores with its greater trunk depth: the floor lies further below the loading edge, resulting in a deeper cargo compartment. This is advantageous when items need to be transported "recessed" and less height is required — for example, for stacks of flat boxes, groceries, or luggage that should not protrude.

However, a deeper compartment can make lifting heavy items out of the trunk somewhat more difficult, even though the loading edge height overall differs only slightly.

Conclusion: Those who frequently transport long or tall items or travel with a fully packed interior benefit more from the SEAT Tarraco. Those who value a deeper, well-contoured cargo compartment and often store flat-stacked loads will find advantages in the Renault Austral.