Trunk comparison: Renault Austral vs Toyota Corolla Wagon

Key Differences

The Toyota Corolla Touring Sports offers a significantly longer cargo space with the seats folded down: +10.2 in (16%) compared to the Renault Austral. Even with the first row of seats upright, the Toyota is noticeably roomier with a +6.3 in (19%) longer loading area.

In contrast, there is a significant difference in loading edge height: the loading edge of the Renault Austral is +5.5 in (22%) higher above the road than the Toyota.

Smaller differences (opening height +0.8 in/3% in favor of Toyota, narrow points +1.6 in/4% and opening width +3.5 in/9% in favor of Renault) as well as the identical trunk depth (loading edge to floor) exist but are below the 10% threshold and are not highlighted here.

Impact on Usability

The longer loading area of the Toyota clearly makes it more practical for long items and for transporting larger volumes with folded down or partially folded seats (e.g., furniture, long sports equipment).

Those who often transport bulky, elongated cargo or regularly need the maximum loading length will find the Corolla the better solution.

The significantly higher loading edge of the Renault means increased effort when lifting heavy items into the trunk. For regular loading and unloading of heavy loads (e.g., toolboxes, heavy shopping loads), the Toyota is more ergonomic and easier to handle due to the lower loading edge.

The slightly larger opening and interior width of the Renault (below 10%) can offer advantages when loading wide items or bulky boxes but is less decisive compared to the length and loading edge differences. Since the depth of both vehicles is the same, it does not affect usability in either direction.