Trunk comparison: Renault Clio vs Durchschnitt Wagon

Biggest Differences

The average wagon offers significantly more cargo length: +16.1 in (31%) with the seats folded down and +11.4 in (41%) with the first row of seats upright compared to the Renault Clio. The loading edge of the wagon is considerably higher than that of the Clio: +15.4 in (163%) above the road.

Conversely, the Renault Clio has a significantly greater depth between the loading edge and the trunk floor: +28.7 in (1825%) compared to the average wagon.

Smaller differences (under 10%) are the height of the trunk opening (+2 in / 7%) as well as the width at the narrowest point (+1.2 in / 3%) and the width of the opening (+1.6 in / 4%) — these are less decisive in practice.

What are the implications for usability?

Due to the significantly greater cargo length, the wagon is better suited for long or bulky loads: furniture, long pipes, or bulky boxes can be more easily accommodated, both with folded seats and with normal seating.

The higher trunk opening of the wagon is slightly advantageous for loading large items but does not have a strong effect.

The higher loading edge of the wagon makes lifting heavy objects more strenuous — especially when loading alone. Here, the Clio scores with a lower loading edge: heavy lifting from the curb is easier.

The very large "depth" of the Clio (loading edge → trunk floor) means that the trunk floor lies significantly below the loading edge.

This creates a deep well that can store small or loose items more securely and prevents shifting — but at the same time, it reduces the usable flat cargo area for long, flat items and makes reaching and lifting lower-lying cargo more difficult.

In summary: Those who regularly transport long or bulky cargo clearly benefit from the wagon. Those who often lift heavy objects from the ground or curb and prefer a lower loading edge (with an overall smaller cargo volume) can find a practical advantage in the Clio.