Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: Renault Clio vs Seat Tarraco

Trunk comparison: Renault Clio vs Seat Tarraco

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Renault Clio and Seat Tarraco
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Renault Clio and Seat Tarraco

Key Differences and Their Impact

The SEAT Tarraco offers significantly more cargo length: +21.7 in (42%) with the seats folded down and +16.1 in (58%) with the first row upright compared to the Renault Clio.

Practically, this means the Tarraco can accommodate longer items and more luggage – ideal for transporting furniture, long sports equipment, or vacation gear. The Clio is noticeably shorter inside and therefore less suitable for large/long loading tasks.

The trunk opening of the Tarraco is both higher and wider: +3.5 in (12%) in opening height and +5.9 in (15%) in opening width.

This makes loading and unloading tall and wide items easier; bulky cargo fits more often without folding or tilting seats. However, the narrowest width is the same for both models, so tight spots in the middle remain a shared limitation.

There are major differences in the loading height/floor ratio: The depth of the trunk (loading edge to trunk floor) is +28 in (1183%) greater in the Renault Clio than in the Tarraco, while the Tarraco’s loading edge is overall +20.1 in (213%) higher above the road. Implications for usability:

  • The higher loading edge of the Tarraco means heavy items must be lifted higher — this can make loading physically more demanding, but is less problematic for vehicles with a ramp or bumper.
  • The deeper trunk floor (large "depth") in the Clio results in a significantly deeper cargo area below the loading edge. This can be advantageous for transporting bulky but low loads (more "recess"), but makes reaching items at the very bottom harder and may reduce lifting over the loading edge.

In summary: For large, long, and bulky loads, the SEAT Tarraco is clearly advantageous — longer cargo space, larger opening height and width make loading easier.

The Renault Clio remains more urban and lower at the loading edge, which facilitates loading and unloading heavy items from the ground, but offers significantly less space for long or bulky goods and has other limitations accessing stored luggage due to the large interior depth.