Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: Renault Clio vs Skoda Superb Wagon

Trunk comparison: Renault Clio vs Skoda Superb Wagon

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Renault Clio and Skoda Superb Wagon
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Renault Clio and Skoda Superb Wagon

Key Differences

The Škoda Superb Wagon offers significantly more cargo length: +31.9 in (61%) with the seats folded down and +13.8 in (49%) with the first row upright. The trunk opening of the Škoda is also +3.1 in (11%) higher than the Clio's. The loading edge of the Škoda is considerably higher above the road: +13.8 in (146%).

Conversely, the Renault Clio has a significantly greater depth between the loading edge and trunk floor: +27.2 in (863%) compared to the Superb. The narrowest width of both trunks is the same, and the opening width of the Škoda is only slightly larger (+2.4 in / 6%) and is not highlighted here.

Impact on Usability

Volume and length: Due to the significantly greater cargo length, the Superb Wagon is better suited for long items (furniture, slats, skis) and for transports requiring a lot of depth. For families or regular transport of larger loads, the Superb is the more practical choice.

Loading height and handling: The higher loading edge of the Škoda makes lifting heavy items more strenuous; those who frequently load heavy cargo or do not have a lifting assist will see the Clio (lower loading edge) as an advantage.

The greater depth in the Clio indicates a trunk floor positioned lower relative to the loading edge — this can make securing cargo easier and prevents items from falling out as easily, but often requires a short lift and lower motion when stowing.

Opening height: The higher trunk opening of the Superb (+3.1 in) makes it easier to accommodate taller items compared to the Clio.

Width: Since the narrowest width is the same, both vehicles are equally limiting for very wide loads; the small difference in opening width (Škoda +2.4 in) is practically negligible.

Summary

For maximum payload, longer or taller items, and regular family/transport tasks, the Škoda Superb Wagon is clearly superior. The Renault Clio scores with a lower loading edge and a trunk floor positioned lower, which can make handling frequent, rather smaller or heavier individual items easier in everyday use.

Which advantages are more important depends on the intended use: volume and length (Superb) vs. easier loading at lower heights (Clio).