Trunk comparison: Renault Clio vs Tesla Model Y

Key Differences (highlighted: >10%)

With the seats folded down, the trunk of the Tesla Model Y is 24.4 in (47%) longer than that of the Renault Clio. This provides significantly more loading length for long or bulky items.

With the first row of seats upright, the trunk of the Tesla Model Y is 15.7 in (56%) longer than that of the Clio. This means more usable cargo space with full occupancy.

The depth of the trunk (loading edge → trunk floor) of the Renault Clio is 30.3 in (7600%) greater than that of the Model Y. This describes a significantly deeper cargo area in the Clio.

The loading edge of the Tesla Model Y is 18.1 in (192%) higher above the road than that of the Renault Clio. The higher loading edge means more lift height when loading from street/ground level.

Impact on Usability

Tesla Model Y: The significantly longer cargo space (both with folded seats and with upright seats) makes the Model Y better suited for long items (e.g., slats, skis, furniture parts) and for transporting larger amounts of luggage with full occupancy.

At the same time, the significantly higher loading edge makes loading and unloading heavy or bulky boxes more difficult — here, aids (lifting assistance, ramps) or more strength are needed.

Renault Clio: The lower loading edge height makes it easier to load heavy or bulky items because less lift height is required.

The much greater depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor creates a deep cargo well, which is well suited for "sinking" and stacking items, but offers less space for long items due to the shorter loading length. Therefore, the Clio is less flexible for long loads.

Small differences such as the width of the trunk opening or the height of the opening (each <10%) play a lesser role in everyday use and affect usability less strongly than the points highlighted above.