Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: Seat Ibiza vs Volvo V90

Trunk comparison: Seat Ibiza vs Volvo V90

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Seat Ibiza and Volvo V90
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Seat Ibiza and Volvo V90

Key Differences

The Volvo V90 offers significantly more cargo length: with the seats folded down, the trunk is 20.9 in (38%) longer, and with the first row upright, even 18.1 in (68%) longer than the SEAT Ibiza. The loading opening of the V90 is 10.2 in (30%) wider, which makes it easier to load wider items.

The SEAT Ibiza, on the other hand, has a higher trunk opening (+4.7 in / 17%) and a significantly greater depth between the loading edge and trunk floor (+7.5 in / 1800%) as well as a higher loading edge above the road (+3.1 in / 13%) compared to the Volvo V90.

Impact on Usability

Volvo V90 — better for long and bulky cargo: - The significantly greater cargo length (both with folded seats and with the rear bench upright) makes the V90 the better choice for long items (e.g., furniture, boards, skis) or when a large volume needs to be transported regularly. - The wider loading opening facilitates loading bulky, wide objects and reduces the likelihood of hitting the sides.

SEAT Ibiza — advantages with vertical and protected cargo areas, but handling disadvantages: - The higher loading opening height means taller items can more easily pass through the opening upright. - The greater depth between the loading edge and trunk floor indicates a lower cargo floor, which effectively increases usable visible volume and can store luggage more securely and deeper.

This can be practical when items need to be stacked or stored sideways. - The higher loading edge above the road makes lifting heavy items into the trunk more strenuous and less practical than in the V90.

Conclusion: For regular transport of long or wide cargo, the Volvo V90 is clearly advantageous. The SEAT Ibiza offers benefits for storing taller items and with a lower cargo floor, but due to the higher loading edge and overall shorter cargo length, it is less suitable for large, bulky transports.