Trunk comparison: Seat Ibiza vs VW Polo

Key Differences

Numerically, the models differ only slightly in length: With the rear seats folded down, the SEAT Ibiza is 1.2 in (≈2%) longer, and with the rear seats upright, it is 0.8 in (≈3%) longer in favor of the Ibiza.

Two values favoring the Ibiza are more significant: the height of the trunk opening is 5.1 in (≈19%) larger and the depth of the trunk (distance from loading edge to trunk floor) is 4.3 in (≈138%) greater than in the Polo.

The VW Polo, on the other hand, has a 1.2 in (≈3%) wider width at the narrowest point and a 1.6 in (≈5%) wider trunk opening; additionally, the Polo's loading edge is 0.4 in (≈1%) higher above the ground than the Ibiza's.

Impact on Usability

The two notable differences in the Ibiza — significantly higher opening and much greater depth — have practical consequences: A 5.1 in higher opening makes loading and unloading bulky or tall items (e.g., boxes, strollers, plants) easier because more vertical space is available.

The significantly greater depth means more usable cargo volume vertically and allows better stacking or accommodation of items that extend lower. Together, these make the Ibiza overall better suited for transporting tall or bulky cargo.

The Polo remains advantageous when it comes to wide cargo: Its slightly greater width at the narrowest point and the wider opening (each by a few centimeters) make loading very wide items easier.

The Polo's loading edge being 0.4 in higher practically makes little difference when lifting — the Ibiza has a minimal advantage here with a slightly lower lift height.

Conclusion: For frequent transport of tall or low-placed items, the SEAT Ibiza is the more practical choice. For very wide items, the VW Polo offers slight advantages. For normal everyday and shopping trips, the differences are overall minor.