Trunk comparison: Skoda Elroq vs Volvo XC40

Key Differences

The most noticeable difference concerns the usable loading length with the first row of seats upright: The Volvo XC40 has a loading area that is 4.3 in (≈14%) longer with the front row upright than the Skoda Elroq.

All other dimensions differ only slightly: When all seats are folded down, the Volvo is only 0.4 in (1%) longer; the width at the narrowest point is 0.4 in (1%) greater on the Volvo than the Elroq, and the width of the trunk opening is 1.2 in (3%) larger on the Volvo.

The Skoda Elroq has a trunk opening that is 1.2 in (4%) higher and a depth (loading edge to trunk floor) that is 0.4 in (≈0%) greater. The loading edge of the Volvo sits 2.4 in (≈9%) higher above the road than the Skoda.

Impact on Usability

The 14% longer loading area of the XC40 with the front row upright makes it noticeably more practical for longer items to be transported without folding seats down – such as skis, long packages, or flat furniture parts.

This improves everyday usability when frequently transporting longer loads with full seating occupancy.

The Skoda Elroq, on the other hand, offers slight advantages when loading: The trunk opening is 1.2 in higher and the loading edge slightly lower, making it marginally easier to lift heavy or bulky items.

The slightly greater depth (0.4 in) and almost identical widths result in overall comparable usability for normal shopping and luggage transport.

Conclusion: For regular transport of longer items with full seating, the Volvo XC40 is the better choice. If handling during loading (lower loading edge, higher opening) is more important, the Skoda Elroq has slight advantages. All other differences are minor and hardly affect everyday practicality.