Trunk comparison: Skoda Kamiq vs Volvo XC60

Key Differences

The Volvo XC60 offers significantly more length in cargo volume: with the seats folded down it is +9.8 in (16%) longer and with the rear seat upright +8.7 in (30%) longer than the Skoda Kamiq. Additionally, the interior at the narrowest point of the Volvo's trunk is +4.7 in (12%) wider than the Kamiq's.

In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq has a higher trunk opening and more vertical depth: the opening height is +3.9 in (14%) higher and the depth (loading edge → trunk floor) is +6.3 in (1500%) greater than the Volvo's.

Impact on Usability

Volvo XC60 — better for long and wide cargo: The greater length with folded seats and even with the rear seat upright makes the XC60 more suitable for longer items (e.g., slats, skis, long boxes) and provides significantly more usable cargo space in everyday use.

The greater width at the narrowest point makes loading wide or irregularly shaped items easier without hassle.

Skoda Kamiq — better for tall and deep-set cargo as well as easier lifting: The higher trunk opening and significantly greater depth to the trunk floor allow loading of tall items (crates, plants, bulky boxes) and create more vertical space.

Additionally, the loading edge in the Kamiq is lower (the Volvo is only slightly higher by +0.8 in, a minor difference), which makes lifting heavy items somewhat easier.

In short: For maximum length and width in transport, the Volvo XC60 scores higher; for tall, deep-set cargo and somewhat easier lifting, the Skoda Kamiq is more advantageous. Smaller differences like the Volvo's +0.8 in higher loading edge are practically negligible.