Trunk comparison: Skoda Karoq vs Volvo XC60
Key Differences
The Volvo XC60 offers significantly more length in the cargo area:
and
than the Škoda Karoq. The Škoda clearly has the advantage in vertical dimensions:
and
than in the Volvo. Smaller differences not highlighted: the loading edge of the Volvo is 1.6 in (6%) higher above the ground, the narrowest width is 10% larger in the Volvo (not >10% marking), and the opening width in the Volvo is 8% larger.
Impact on Usability
The longer loading dimensions of the Volvo make it more practical for long items (e.g., furniture boards, skis, or long boxes) — both with folded seats and in the normal state, more usable loading length remains. The slightly larger narrowest width of the Volvo also makes it easier to store wide but flat cargo. The Škoda scores with tall and bulky cargo: the larger opening height and significantly deeper loading floor mean more vertical and usable space behind the loading edge. This makes the Karoq better suited for tall and bulky items that need to be stored standing or with some depth. Additionally, the lower loading edge of the Karoq is practical when loading and unloading heavy loads (although the height difference to the loading edge is only 1.6 in). In short: Volvo = better for length and overall linear storage space; Škoda = better for height, vertical space, and handling bulky, tall items.