Trunk comparison: Skoda Octavia Wagon vs Volvo XC60

Key Differences

When comparing, four differences stand out that are greater than 10%: The Škoda offers a cargo area length with the first row of seats upright that is +5.1 in (14%) longer than the Volvo.

The depth of the trunk (loading edge to trunk floor) of the Škoda is +3.9 in (900%) larger. The loading edge of the Volvo sits +3.1 in (13%) higher above the road than the Škoda. At its narrowest point, the Volvo's trunk is +4.3 in (11%) wider than the Škoda's.

Impact on Usability

These differences result in concrete advantages and disadvantages in practice: Due to the longer cargo area with the rear seat upright and the significantly greater trunk depth, the Škoda is better suited for long or deep loads (e.g., roof rack parts, long boxes, bulky equipment) because more length and "depth space" can be utilized.

The lower loading edge of the Škoda (since the Volvo's loading edge is +3.1 in higher) also makes lifting heavy items into the trunk easier.

The Volvo, on the other hand, scores points with wide loads: The narrowest trunk width is +4.3 in larger, making it easier to load wider or cubic items. However, the higher loading edge makes loading heavy objects more cumbersome.

Conclusion: Those who frequently transport long, deep, or heavy items and benefit from a lower loading edge will find more everyday usefulness in the Škoda Octavia Wagon.

Those who more often transport wide, bulky, rather square loads benefit from the larger trunk width of the Volvo XC60 — despite the higher loading edge.