Trunk comparison: Tesla Model 3 vs Volvo XC60

Key Differences

Several differences stand out from the data. The trunk of the Tesla Model 3 is about +11% longer with the front seats upright than that of the Volvo XC60, giving the Model 3 more usable depth for long items. The height of the Volvo XC60's trunk opening is +42% larger than the Tesla's, making it easier to load bulky, tall items diagonally or upright.

Also notable is the trunk "depth" (loading edge to trunk floor): the Model 3 is listed with +1000%, indicating a significantly deeper/recessed cargo floor compared to the XC60. Additionally, the narrowest width inside the Volvo's trunk is +17% larger and the width of the trunk opening is +12% larger than the Tesla's, allowing wider loads to fit more easily in the XC60.

Implications for Usability

The longer usable cargo floor in the Model 3 (with front seats upright) makes it more suitable for long, flat loads (e.g., furniture boards, skis), as long as the height or width of the load fits within the narrower opening.

The significantly larger opening and interior space in height and width of the XC60 improves handling of bulky, tall, or wide items: furniture pieces, crates, or larger boxes can be lifted and slid in more easily.

The stated greater "depth" in the Tesla suggests a deeper trunk floor or a stronger recess behind the loading edge — this facilitates storing flat or stacked items and prevents them from protruding over the loading edge.

Conversely, the Volvo has a slightly higher loading edge (listed here as +7%), which can make lifting heavy items in slightly more difficult, while the larger opening height compensates for lifting vertically.

In summary: For long, flat loads and a deeper, well-utilized cargo floor, the Tesla Model 3 scores; for wide, tall, or bulky items, the Volvo XC60 is more practical due to its larger opening and greater interior width.