Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: Tesla Model 3 vs VW T-Roc

Trunk comparison: Tesla Model 3 vs VW T-Roc

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Tesla Model 3 and VW T-Roc
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Tesla Model 3 and VW T-Roc

Key Differences (highlighted: >10%)

- The Tesla Model 3 offers a significantly longer loading length: +15.4 in (26%) with folded seats and +11.4 in (37%) with the first row upright compared to the VW T‑Roc.
- The trunk opening of the VW T‑Roc is +13.4 in (65%) higher than that of the Tesla Model 3.
- The depth of the trunk (loading edge → trunk floor) is +4.3 in (100%) greater in the VW T‑Roc.
- The loading edge of the VW T‑Roc is +3.9 in (15%) higher above the road than that of the Tesla Model 3.
- The width of the trunk opening of the VW T‑Roc is +5.1 in (13%) larger than that of the Tesla Model 3.
- The narrowest width inside the trunk is only slightly larger in the VW T‑Roc: +2.4 in (6%) – not highlighted as it is ≤10%.

What impact do these differences have on usability?

- Tesla Model 3 (longer loading length): Advantage for long, flat items (e.g., furniture panels, skis, slats). The significantly greater depth with folded seats makes it easier to accommodate longer loads. However, the lower opening height and width of the Model 3 limit loading of tall or very bulky items.

- VW T‑Roc (higher opening, higher loading edge, larger opening width): Advantage when loading bulky, tall, or wide items that need to be loaded upright or are cumbersome (e.g., boxes, crates, folding bikes without disassembly).

The higher loading edge (+3.9 in) means heavy items must be lifted higher — requiring more strength or aids when loading. The larger opening height (+13.4 in) and opening width (+5.1 in) compensate for this with bulky items.

- Practical conclusion: For frequent transport of long, flat items, the Model 3 is more user-friendly. For frequent loading of tall or bulky items, the T‑Roc is more practical despite the higher loading edge. Differences in the narrowest interior width are small and rarely decisive.