Trunk comparison: Volvo XC40 vs VW Caddy Wagon

Key Differences

The most noticeable differences are in length, height, and accessibility: With the seats folded down, the Volvo XC40 offers a cargo area that is 20.5 in longer (+45%) than the VW Caddy Wagon.

However, with the front row seats upright, the VW Caddy Wagon has a cargo area that is 6.3 in longer (+18%) than the XC40. The trunk opening of the Caddy is 16.1 in higher (+56%), and the depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor is 0.8 in greater (+100%).

The loading edge of the Volvo is 7.1 in higher above the road (+32%) than that of the Caddy. At its narrowest point, the Caddy is 4.7 in wider (+12%); the width of the opening is only 7% larger in the Caddy (below the 10% mark) and thus less significant.

Impact on Usability

Volvo XC40: The significantly greater loading length with fully folded seats makes the XC40 better suited for very long, flat items (e.g., long moldings, skis, or furniture parts) when seating is not needed.

However, the higher loading edge (+7.1 in) increases the effort required to lift heavy items in and makes side loading of large cargo more difficult. The narrower interior width at the tightest point also limits handling of wide goods.

VW Caddy Wagon: The advantages of the Caddy lie in frequent use with upright seating and transporting bulky or tall items: with the first row seats upright, more usable length remains (+6.3 in), the trunk opening is significantly higher (+16.1 in), and the interior is deeper (+0.8 in), which facilitates loading tall or bulky cargo.

The lower loading edge makes lifting heavy loads easier. Additionally, the narrowest width is larger (+4.7 in), allowing wider items to fit more easily. The slightly larger opening width (+7%) is only a minor advantage.

In summary: For very long, flat loads with an empty seat row, the Volvo XC40 is more advantageous. For everyday use with passengers, frequent loading of tall or bulky goods, and easier lifting of heavy loads, the VW Caddy Wagon is more practical.