Trunk comparison: Volvo XC40 vs VW T-Roc

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Volvo XC40 and VW T-Roc

Key Differences (>10%)

In terms of usable cargo space, the Volvo XC40 measures significantly longer in two scenarios: with the seats folded down, the XC40 has a trunk that is 7.9 in (14%) longer, and with the first row upright, the XC40 remains 5.1 in (17%) longer than the VW T‑Roc.

On the other hand, the trunk opening of the VW T‑Roc is 5.1 in (18%) higher than that of the XC40. Additionally, the T‑Roc has a significantly greater depth between the loading edge and the trunk floor: 8.7 in (2100%) more than the XC40.

Implications for Usability

The longer interior dimensions of the Volvo XC40 provide a clear advantage especially for long items: boards, skis, longer boxes, or furniture pieces are easier to accommodate in the XC40 since more usable length is available. For buyers who regularly need to transport long cargo, the XC40 is more practical.

The VW T‑Roc scores with its higher opening and significantly greater trunk depth. The higher opening makes it easier to load taller or bulky items (e.g., tall boxes or plants).

The greater depth (loading edge → trunk floor) increases the total volume below the loading edge and allows for more vertical storage space; however, it also creates a more pronounced step/loading recess that must be considered when loading and unloading: heavy items need to be lifted over the loading edge and then lowered further down, and small items can sit deeper and are harder to reach.

Additional notes: The loading edge of the T‑Roc is only slightly higher (+0.8 in, ≈3%) — which has little practical effect — and the narrowest width of both trunks is identical; the trunk opening of the T‑Roc is slightly wider (+2.8 in, 7%), but this value is below the 10% threshold and is therefore less relevant.

Conclusion

For frequent transport of long items, the Volvo XC40 is the better choice. Those who need more vertical space and a larger opening for tall or bulky cargo benefit from the VW T‑Roc but must take the deeper loading recess into account when loading and unloading.