Trunk comparison: Volvo XC60 vs VW T-Cross

Key Differences

The Volvo XC60 offers significantly more cargo length than the VW T-Cross: with the rear seat folded down, the trunk of the Volvo is +13 in (23%) longer, and with the front seats upright, even +11.8 in (45%) longer.

At the narrowest point, the Volvo is +4.3 in (11%) wider, and the trunk opening is +5.5 in (14%) larger on the Volvo. Conversely, the VW T-Cross has a significantly greater depth between the loading edge and the trunk floor: +6.3 in (1500%) in favor of the T-Cross.

Impact on Usability

The longer and wider cargo area of the Volvo XC60 makes it clearly more practical for long or wide items (e.g., slats, skis, long furniture parts) as well as for bulky luggage and larger boxes.

The larger opening facilitates sliding in and side loading of bulky items. Overall, the XC60 is better suited for transports with variable loading and for users who regularly need to carry larger/unconventional cargo.

The VW T-Cross scores with the significantly greater depth (loading edge → trunk floor). This creates a deeper cargo well that makes items less prone to shifting and better conceals smaller objects in the cargo space.

However, the shorter length and narrower width greatly limit the accommodation of large or elongated cargo. Heavy items can be somewhat less convenient to lift and remove from the deeper well.

Conclusion: For transporting long or wide loads and high flexibility, the Volvo XC60 is the more practical choice. For everyday usability with secure storage of smaller items and a deeper cargo well, the VW T-Cross can offer advantages but falls significantly behind the Volvo in volume and dimensions.