Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: VW Caddy Wagon vs Durchschnitt Compact SUV

Trunk comparison: VW Caddy Wagon vs Durchschnitt Compact SUV

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the VW Caddy Wagon and Durchschnitt Compact SUV
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the VW Caddy Wagon and Durchschnitt Compact SUV

Key Differences

With the rear seats folded down, the average compact SUV offers 13 in (28%) more cargo length than the Volkswagen Caddy Wagon.

However, with the front seats upright, the Volkswagen Caddy Wagon has 11.8 in (39%) more usable trunk depth than the compact SUV. The trunk opening of the Caddy is significantly higher: 13.8 in (44%) more height than the average compact SUV.

The depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor is 4.7 in (600%) greater in the compact SUV than in the Caddy. The loading edge of the compact SUV is 6.7 in (30%) higher above the road than that of the Caddy.

In width, the Caddy is stronger both front and rear: the narrowest point of the trunk is 5.9 in (15%) wider and the width of the trunk opening is 6.3 in (16%) larger than in the average compact SUV.

What Impact Does This Have on Usability?

For long, flat loads with folded seats, the compact SUV is more advantageous due to the 13 in (28%) longer cargo area — it can accommodate longer boards or luggage more easily when no or few passengers are being transported.

However, if multiple passengers remain seated, the Caddy is clearly advantageous: with 11.8 in (39%) more trunk depth with the front seats upright, it offers significantly more everyday practicality for luggage, strollers, or shopping.

The Caddy is also more practical for loading and unloading bulky, tall, or wide items: the trunk opening is 13.8 in (44%) higher and the opening as well as the narrowest point are 6.3 in (16%) and 5.9 in (15%) wider, respectively, than in the compact SUV.

This makes it easier to store boxes, equipment, or bulky parts and reduces the risk of catching on edges.

The compact SUV, on the other hand, has a significantly greater depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor (+4.7 in, 600%), combined with a higher loading edge above the road (+6.7 in, 30%).

This means heavy cargo must be lifted higher, and the deeper cargo floor can be inconvenient when pulling items out. Although the greater depth can contribute to more usable volume, it makes loading and unloading more strenuous and can complicate storing very flat items.

In summary: For drivers who regularly transport passengers along with bulky or wide items, the Volkswagen Caddy Wagon is more practical.

For occasional users who primarily want to transport long items with an empty rear seat, the compact SUV offers more cargo length but at the cost of a higher loading edge and narrower opening.