Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: VW ID.4 vs Durchschnitt SUV

Trunk comparison: VW ID.4 vs Durchschnitt SUV

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the VW ID.4 and Durchschnitt SUV
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the VW ID.4 and Durchschnitt SUV

Summary of the Biggest Differences

The VW ID.4 offers a somewhat different trunk geometry compared to an average SUV: with the seats folded down, the ID.4 is about 3.1 in (≈5%) longer, but with the first row of seats upright, it is significantly longer (+3.5 in /

11%

). The trunk opening is 1.2 in (4%) higher, the width at the narrowest point is 0.8 in (2%) less in the ID.4, and the opening width of the tailgate is 0.4 in (1%) larger. Particularly notable is the depth of the interior (distance from loading edge → trunk floor): this is 2 in and thus

100%

greater in the ID.4 than in the average SUV. The loading edge itself is slightly lower in the ID.4 (average SUV is +0.4 in higher).

Impact on Usability

The

11% longer

loading area with the first row of seats upright improves everyday usability for longer items without folding the seats down (e.g., skis, long boxes, boards). This makes the ID.4 more practical when regularly transporting longer but not very wide loads. The significantly greater trunk depth (↑2 in /

100%

) increases usable volume especially in the cargo width below the loading edge. Practically, this means more storage space for bulky but not very tall items and better packing of luggage, as there is more room "in depth." Together with the slightly lower loading edge (ID.4 about ~0.4 in easier to reach), this results in overall more comfortable loading of bulky or heavy parts. Small disadvantages: The 0.8 in narrower width at the narrowest point can slightly limit storing very wide items but is usually unproblematic in practice. The 0.4 in larger tailgate opening width is a small advantage when sliding through wider items. Conclusion: For users who frequently transport longer or bulky, not overly wide cargo, the ID.4 offers noticeable advantages due to the longer loading area with the rear seats upright and the significantly greater depth. Wide cargo benefits less; here the differences are marginal.