Trunk comparison: Audi Q2 vs Citroen C3

Key Differences

The Audi Q2 offers a longer cargo floor with the first row of seats upright than the Citroën C3 — specifically, the Q2 is 4.3 in or 16% longer.

In contrast, the C3 has a significantly greater built-in/loading depth inside the trunk between the loading edge and the trunk floor: the C3 is 4.7 in or 109% higher here than the Q2. All other differences (trunk length with seats folded down, widths, and opening height/loading edge height) are below the 10% mark and thus moderate.

Impact on Usability

The longer cargo floor of the Audi Q2 with seats upright makes it more practical for longer items that need to be transported without folding down the rear seat (e.g., skis, long packages, furniture parts). Since the Q2’s trunk opening is also slightly wider, bulky items can be loaded crosswise more easily.

The significantly greater depth in the Citroën C3 means the trunk interior sits deeper, providing more "vertical" space for stacking or accommodating taller items.

This can make the C3 better suited for taller or less delicate cargo that is securely positioned in a deeper well. At the same time, the slightly higher loading edge of the C3 (albeit only marginally) can make lifting heavy loads a bit more strenuous.

Conclusion: For longer, flat cargo without folding down the rear seat, the Audi Q2 is the more practical choice; for deeper, taller, or better-secured cargo, the Citroën C3 offers advantages due to its significantly greater interior depth.