Trunk comparison: BMW 3 Series Touring vs Skoda Kamiq

Key Differences (over 10%)

The BMW 3 Series Touring offers a longer cargo area with the rear seats folded down: +8.7 in (14%) compared to the Škoda Kamiq. When the front seats are upright, the BMW's advantage even increases to +10.2 in (35%).

In contrast, the Kamiq has significantly larger vertical dimensions: the height of the trunk opening is +4.7 in (17%) higher, the depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor is significantly greater at +5.9 in (1500%), and the loading edge is +3.9 in (17%) higher above the ground.

What are the implications of these differences for usability?

The BMW 3 Series Touring clearly has the advantage for long, flat, or elongated loads: lumber, long suitcases, or skis can be transported more easily because the usable loading length is significantly greater both with folded and upright seats.

Also, when loading heavier items, the lower loading edge of the BMW helps because less effort is needed to lift items in.

The Škoda Kamiq scores points with tall or bulky items: the higher trunk opening and greater depth create more vertical space behind the loading edge, allowing bulky, tall items or boxes to be stored upright more easily.

The downside is the higher loading edge (+3.9 in): heavy luggage must be lifted higher, which makes loading and unloading more difficult.

Width differences of +1.6 in and +0.8 in in favor of the Kamiq are minor and have little practical impact on usability.

Conclusion: For long, flat loads and easier lifting of heavy items, the BMW 3 Series Touring is the better choice. For tall, bulky, or upright cargo, the Škoda Kamiq offers advantages due to its greater vertical space, despite the higher loading edge.