Trunk comparison: BMW 3 Series Touring vs Skoda Karoq

Key Differences

The BMW 3 Series Touring offers significantly more cargo space in length: with the seats folded down, its trunk is +7.5 in (12%) longer, and with the front row upright, even +9.4 in (32%) longer than the Škoda Karoq.

In contrast, the Škoda Karoq has several larger dimensions in height: the trunk opening is +7.9 in (28%) higher, the depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor is noticeably greater at +5.5 in (1400%), and the loading edge sits +3.1 in (13%) higher above the ground than in the BMW.

Smaller differences in width (at the narrowest point +2.4 in / 6% and opening width +1.6 in / 4% in favor of the Karoq) exist but are below the 10% threshold and thus less significant.

What are the implications of these differences for use?

The longer loading dimensions of the BMW make it the better choice for long, flat items: roof rack materials, long furniture parts, skis, or roller shutter profiles benefit from the additional loading length—both with the rear seats folded down and in everyday use with the seats upright.

Those who frequently transport long items or prioritize maximum loading length will find noticeable advantages in the BMW.

The Škoda Karoq scores points for volume and vertical accessibility: the higher trunk opening and significantly greater depth between the loading edge and floor allow for placing or stacking taller or bulkier items and create a deeper cargo area.

This is practical for bulky, tall loads (e.g., boxes, camping gear, plants) and for stored items that should be recessed somewhat deeper. However, the higher loading edge makes lifting heavy loads in somewhat more difficult compared to the lower BMW sill.

In summary: BMW 3 Series Touring = advantage in length utilization and long items; Škoda Karoq = advantage in vertical space, deeper usable depth, and storage options, but with a higher loading edge when loading heavy items.