Trunk comparison: BMW 3 Series Touring vs VW Tiguan

Key Differences

In the trunk, there is a clear advantage in usable loading length: The BMW 3 Series Touring offers a loading area that is +4.7 in (14%) longer with the first row of seats upright than the VW Tiguan.

With the seats folded down, the differences are minimal (+1.2 in / 2%). Also notable is the loading edge: On the VW Tiguan, the loading edge is +5.5 in (23%) higher above the ground than on the BMW.

All other specified dimensions differ by less than 10% (height of the trunk opening +0.8 in / 3% in favor of Tiguan; width at the narrowest point +2.4 in / 6% in favor of Tiguan; width of the trunk opening +3.5 in / 9% in favor of Tiguan). The depth (loading edge to trunk floor) is the same.

Impact on Usability

The 14% longer loading length of the BMW with the rear seat upright makes it more practical for longer items when the rear seat is not folded down (e.g., skis, long boards, or furniture parts). For users who frequently transport long cargo, this reduces the need to fold the seats.

The significantly higher loading edge of the Tiguan (23%) has a rather negative effect on handling heavy or bulky loads: heavy lifting requires more effort, and low-entry rolling carts or low hand trucks fit less comfortably.

On the other hand, the slightly greater interior width and the larger opening width (both under 10% difference) help wide items pass more easily through the opening and provide more room in the cargo space.

Since the depth is identical and the trunk volume with folded seats remains practically the same, both vehicles are comparable at maximum cargo area.

In summary: BMW is better for longer cargo with unchanged seating position; Tiguan offers easier access for wide items but loses out on lifting/loading due to the significantly higher loading edge.