Trunk comparison: BMW X2 vs VW Touran
Key Differences (>10%)
Four values stand out clearly from the comparison: The BMW X2 offers a significantly longer cargo space with upright seating: +23.2 in (174%) compared to the VW Touran.
The trunk opening of the VW Touran is +7.9 in (30%) higher than that of the BMW X2. The depth of the trunk (distance from loading edge → trunk floor) is +3.1 in (800%) greater in the BMW X2. And the loading edge of the BMW X2 is overall +7.1 in (29%) higher above the road than that of the VW Touran.
Impact on Usability
The significantly greater cargo length of the BMW X2 with upright seating makes it more practical when several passengers remain seated and a lot of luggage still needs to be transported (e.g., suitcases, sports bags). In situations with full vehicle occupancy, the X2 offers noticeably more usable floor space.
The higher trunk opening of the VW Touran facilitates loading bulky or tall items: boxes, furniture parts, or tall plants fit more easily through the opening because more height is available. Loading and unloading large items is also more comfortable in the Touran due to the larger clearance.
The greater depth in the BMW X2 means that the floor area inside lies deeper than the loading edge – small items are more likely to disappear behind the loading edge and are less visible; additionally, more vertical storage space is created below the opening.
A disadvantage is that when loading, you have to reach further into the trunk or lift heavy items over a larger edge.
The higher loading edge of the BMW X2 (by 7.1 in) increases the effort required to lift heavy loads in and makes it harder to slide heavy items in sideways. The VW Touran, with its lower loading edge, is more user-friendly for frequent loading and unloading, especially with heavy or rollable loads.
In summary: For full occupancy with luggage and hidden storage options, the BMW X2 scores with more cargo length and a deeper loading floor.
For easy handling, bringing in tall items, and lower lifting effort, the VW Touran is more practical due to its higher opening and lower loading edge. Smaller width and length differences (<10%) are less decisive in practice.