Trunk comparison: Citroen C3 vs Mazda Mazda CX-5

Key Differences

The Mazda CX-5 offers significantly more cargo length: with the seats folded down, the trunk is 13.4 in (25%) longer and with the first row of seats upright, 11.4 in (43%) longer than in the Citroën C3. Additionally, the width of the trunk opening in the CX-5 is 7.1 in (20%) larger.

In contrast, the Citroën C3 has a significantly greater trunk depth (loading edge to trunk floor): +7.1 in (360%). The height of the trunk opening is the same in both models; other differences (loading edge height +0.8 in / 3%, narrowest width +3.5 in / 9%) are under 10%.

Impact on Usability

The longer dimensions and larger opening width of the CX-5 make it more practical for long and wide cargo: long items (e.g., slats, skis, panels, folded furniture) are easier to transport, even when the rear seats are usually upright. The wider opening facilitates maneuvering bulky parts in and out.

The larger, lower trunk floor of the Citroën C3 creates a deeper storage compartment below the loading edge. This can be advantageous for securely storing smaller or taller items that should not shift and increases usable vertical volume.

A downside is that very long, flat items are more difficult to store flat and may require more effort to lift or pull out.

In summary: For transporting long and wide items, the Mazda CX-5 is clearly advantageous. For deeper, more protected storage of smaller/taller cargo, the Citroën C3 can be more practical. Smaller differences like loading edge height and narrowest width are hardly relevant in everyday use.