Trunk comparison: Dacia Duster vs Mazda Mazda CX-5

Key Differences

The most noticeable difference lies in the depth of the trunk (loading edge to trunk floor): the Dacia Duster is 1.2 in or 60% deeper here than the Mazda CX-5. All other measurements differ only slightly: with the seats folded down, the Mazda is 2.4 in (4%) longer, while with the first row of seats upright, the Duster has 0.4 in (1%) more length.

The height of the trunk opening is 0.8 in (3%) greater on the Duster, and the loading edge is at the same height. The narrowest width of the trunk is 2 in (5%) larger on the Mazda, and the width of the trunk opening is 3.1 in (8%) larger on the Mazda.

Impact on Usability

The significantly deeper trunk floor of the Duster increases the usable volume effect: it better accommodates items standing deep or tall and allows more stacking space directly behind the loading edge.

Since the loading edge height is identical, there is no disadvantage when lifting items into the opening, but there is greater internal depth for loading.

The Mazda, on the other hand, scores with width and opening: the greater width at the narrowest point and the wider trunk opening make loading wider or irregularly shaped items considerably easier.

The slightly greater overall length with folded seats (2.4 in) also helps when transporting long items, but has only a minor effect in everyday use.

In summary: For deep, tall, or stacked cargo, the Duster is more practical; for wider, bulky items and easier maneuvering when loading, the Mazda is better suited. Most other differences are so small that they hardly matter in daily use.