Trunk comparison: Fiat Panda vs VW Touran

Key Differences

The biggest differences concern the usable cargo length and the height of the trunk space. The VW Touran offers +26.8 in (61%) more trunk length with the seats folded down and +18.5 in (87%) more length with the first row of seats upright than the Fiat Panda.

In the opposite condition — with all seats upright — the Fiat Panda has +7.9 in (59%) more trunk length than the Touran.

Additionally, the Panda has a significantly greater depth between the loading edge and the trunk floor (+6.7 in, 1700%) and a higher loading edge (+2.8 in, 11%) than the Touran. Width differences at the opening and at the narrowest point are only about ~4% and are therefore negligible.

Impact on Usability

Because the Touran offers a significantly longer cargo space with folded seats and with the first row upright, it is better suited for long or bulky items (e.g., furniture, long sports equipment, occasional moves) and is more flexible when large loading areas are needed.

The Panda, with more length with all seats upright, is more practical when all seats are regularly occupied but trunk space is still needed (groceries, strollers, luggage on trips).

The significantly greater depth of the Panda creates a deeper loading compartment, which increases volume for stackable or irregularly shaped items but can make reaching deep into the trunk more difficult.

The higher loading edge of the Panda also means more lifting effort when loading heavy items; here, the Touran’s lower loading edge offers a practical advantage for frequent or heavy loading.

In summary: For maximum flexibility and transporting long, bulky loads, the VW Touran is the better choice. For everyday use with full occupancy and a relatively deep, well-usable loading opening for smaller/regular loads, the Fiat Panda is advantageous, though at the cost of loading comfort with heavy items.