Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: Ford Focus vs VW Touran

Trunk comparison: Ford Focus vs VW Touran

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Ford Focus and VW Touran
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Ford Focus and VW Touran

Key Differences

The data reveals several notable differences. The VW Touran offers a longer cargo area by 9.4 in (15%) with the seats folded down compared to the Ford Focus. With the first row of seats upright, the Touran is even 9.4 in (31%) longer.

Conversely, the Ford Focus has a significantly larger trunk with all seats fully upright — it is 16.9 in (126%) longer than the Touran.

Additionally, the depth of the Focus trunk (distance from loading edge to trunk floor) differs significantly by +6.7 in (1700%), and the loading edge of the Focus is 2.8 in (11%) higher above the ground.

Smaller differences (under 10%) include: the trunk opening height of the Touran is 2.4 in (8%) higher, and the width differences at the narrowest point as well as at the opening are each about 1.6 in (4%) in favor of the Touran.

Impact on Usability

These differences clearly affect everyday practicality:

  • Transporting long items: Due to the longer cargo area with folded seats (Touran +15%) and with the first row upright (Touran +31%), the VW Touran is better suited when regularly transporting long loads (e.g., slats, long furniture parts, skis), especially when seats are partially or fully folded down.
  • Everyday trunk space with all seats in use: When all seats are upright (typical everyday situation with passengers), the Ford Focus has a significantly larger usable trunk (+126%). This makes the Focus more practical for groceries, suitcases, or luggage when fully occupied.
  • Loading and unloading / Ergonomics: The higher loading edge of the Focus (+2.8 in) makes lifting items in harder, especially heavy objects. Combined with the significantly greater trunk floor depth in the Focus (+6.7 in), this means heavy cargo must be lifted higher but then lies deeper in the cargo area and is better supported. The lower loading edge of the Touran facilitates loading heavy or bulky items.
  • Width and opening: The width differences are small (≈1.6 in) and have little impact in most everyday scenarios; wide items fit similarly well in both vehicles in practice.

Conclusion: Those who frequently transport long items or regularly fold down the rear seats benefit from the VW Touran.

Those who need more practical trunk space for luggage and groceries with full seating get significantly more volume in the Ford Focus — albeit at the cost of a higher loading edge and somewhat less favorable loading ergonomics.