Trunk comparison: Ford Escape vs Skoda Kamiq

Key Differences

Different dimensions dominate the capacity: The Ford Kuga offers a significantly longer loading length, both with the seats folded down and with the first row upright — +7.9 in (13%) more length with folded seats and +9.4 in (32%) more length with upright seats compared to the Skoda Kamiq.

The Skoda Kamiq scores with more vertical space: The trunk opening height is +3.1 in (11%) larger and the depth from the loading edge level to the trunk floor is even +5.9 in (1500%) greater than in the Kuga.

The loading edge height is the same, width differences at the narrowest point (+2 in / 5%) and at the opening (+1.6 in / 4%) are minor and practically negligible.

Impact on Usability

The greater loading length of the Kuga makes it better suited for long, flat goods like laminate, boards, skis, or long boxes — these can be slid in more easily and further, even when the rear seats are upright. Those who regularly transport bulky lengths or frequently work with folded seats benefit from the Kuga.

The Kamiq is practical when more height and deeper loading capacity are required: The higher opening and significantly greater depth allow loading tall or bulky items that need space in height (e.g., stacked boxes, plants, large suitcases).

However, the greater depth also means that heavy items must be lifted further down and back when loading — this can make lifting more difficult but often reduces shifting during driving.

In short: For length-heavy loads and flexibility with folded seats, the Ford Kuga is the more practical choice. For taller, bulky, or stackable cargo, the Skoda Kamiq offers advantages through opening height and deeper loading floor. Differences in width and loading edge height are negligible.