Trunk comparison: Ford Escape vs VW ID.4

Key Differences

The most noticeable difference is the depth of the trunk between the loading edge and the trunk floor: the VW ID.4 has +3.5 in (+900%) here compared to the Ford Kuga. This significantly larger "well" in the ID.4 means that part of the cargo sits deeper than in the Kuga.

Other deviations are much smaller (all ≤6%): the Ford Kuga offers about +1.6 in more cargo length with the seats folded down and with the first row upright; the Kuga is about +1.2 in wider at the narrowest point.

The VW ID.4 has a trunk opening that is +1.6 in higher, +0.4 in wider, and a loading edge that is +1.6 in higher above the road.

Impact on Usability

The deeper trunk well in the VW ID.4 makes it practical if you want to transport bulky but not very tall items or many loose objects: parts can be recessed deeper, stand more stably, and use the volume "below" the loading edge.

The deep well is a disadvantage when heavy items need to be loaded and unloaded, as the loading edge of the ID.4 is also somewhat higher (+1.6 in), making lifting over the edge more strenuous. Also, very flat cargo that should sit flush with the loading edge tends to be deeper in the ID.4.

The Ford Kuga offers a slight advantage for long or wider items due to the somewhat greater cargo length (with seats folded and first row upright) and the slightly wider narrowest width.

The lower loading edge of the Kuga makes lifting heavy loads into the vehicle easier. The slightly larger opening height and width of the ID.4 help when inserting tall or bulky items but is only a minor advantage in practical comparison.

Conclusion: For light, frequent loading of heavy items or long/wide cargo, the Kuga has the advantage due to the lower loading edge and somewhat more length/width.

For recessing luggage, bulky parts, or many loose items that should lie stably below the loading edge, the ID.4 is better suited due to the significantly deeper trunk well.