Trunk comparison: Ford S-MAX vs Mazda Mazda CX-5

Key Differences (over 10%)

The Ford S‑Max offers significantly more usable length: With the seats folded down, the trunk is 11 in (16%) longer, and with the first row of seats upright, even 6.3 in (17%) more than in the Mazda CX‑5. This makes the S‑Max noticeably more practical for long items like slats, ladders, furniture boards, or bulky sports equipment.

The vertical dimensions also differ: The trunk opening height is 5.5 in (18%) higher in the S‑Max, allowing tall or bulky items to be loaded upright or at an angle more easily.

The loading edge of the Mazda, on the other hand, is 7.5 in (33%) higher above the road; combined with a 0.8 in (67%) greater depth between the loading edge and trunk floor in the CX‑5, this practically means that the cargo floor level in the Mazda is higher, making lifting heavy items more strenuous (the percentage for depth appears large because the absolute base is small).

The width at the narrowest point is only 0.8 in (2%) larger in the CX‑5, so negligible, and the trunk opening width of both models is the same.

What impact does this have on usability?

For users who regularly transport long or bulky items (craftsmen, outdoor athletes, families with large luggage), the Ford S‑Max is clearly advantageous: more loading area in length and a higher opening make storing large parts easier.

Additionally, the lower loading edge of the S‑Max makes loading and unloading heavy loads significantly easier.

The Mazda CX‑5 offers only marginally more width at the narrowest point but provides less comfort when lifting heavy items due to the higher loading edge and overall higher cargo floor level.

For occasional city users or drivers who primarily value passenger comfort and SUV driving character, these differences are less relevant; for practical transport tasks, the S‑Max is clearly better suited for everyday use.