Trunk comparison: Jeep Avenger Electric vs Mazda Mazda CX-5

Key Differences

The Mazda CX-5 offers significantly more cargo length: +14.2 in (27%) with the seats folded down and +11.4 in (43%) with the first row upright. In terms of width at the narrowest point, the Mazda also has an advantage: +5.9 in (17%).

The Jeep Avenger Electric stands out with a significantly greater depth between the loading edge and the trunk floor: +2.4 in (120%).

The height of the trunk opening is the same for both models; differences in loading edge height above the road (+1.6 in / 6%) and opening width (+2.8 in / 7%) are under 10% and are not highlighted here.

Impact on Usability

The Mazda CX-5 is better suited for long and wide cargo: longer loading surfaces and more width at the narrowest point make transporting bulky items (e.g., long planks, furniture parts, larger suitcases) easier and provide overall greater usable capacity for family or moving needs.

The greater interior length also means more flexibility with folded seats.

The Jeep Avenger scores with a deeper trunk floor (a relative drop of almost 3.9 in compared to the Mazda, combined with a slightly lower loading edge).

This creates more usable interior height from floor to ceiling and a lower lift height when loading — advantageous for heavy or tall items that require less effort to load or are partially recessed below the loading edge.

Due to the shorter length and narrower interior width, however, the Avenger is more limited when it comes to very long or wide cargo.

Conclusion: For maximum volume and width requirements as well as long items, the Mazda CX-5 is the more practical choice. For easier lifting of heavy items and somewhat more usable interior height with otherwise more compact cargo space, the Jeep Avenger Electric can be advantageous.