Trunk comparison: Kia Sportage vs Volvo XC60

Key Differences

No measured difference exceeds 10%. The largest deviations in favor of the Volvo XC60 are: with seats folded down +3.5 in (5%) longer cargo space, with the first row upright +2.4 in (7%) longer cargo space, at the narrowest point +2.8 in (7%) more width, and at the trunk opening +2.8 in (7%) more width.

The trunk opening is also +0.4 in (1%) higher. Depth of the trunk and height of the loading edge are the same in both models.

Impact on Usability

The longer interior dimensions of the XC60 (5–7%) make it easier to store longer items and increase the possible packing length with seats fully folded down; those who regularly transport long items (e.g., slats, skis, long boxes) have a noticeable, though small, advantage with the XC60. The greater width at the narrowest point and the wider opening (+7%) make loading wider or bulkier items easier and increase the likelihood of placing two suitcases side by side without tilting them.

The only 0.4 in greater opening height of the XC60 is practically negligible; identical loading edge height and depth mean a comparable loading process (lever effect, trunk volume near the floor).

Overall, the differences are moderate: for everyday use and normal luggage, both models are similarly practical. However, those who regularly transport long or wider loads benefit more from the Volvo XC60.