Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-5 vs Durchschnitt Compact SUV

Key Differences

The Mazda CX-5 offers a significantly longer cargo floor: 8.3 in more with seats folded down (+14%) and 7.5 in more with the first row upright (+25%) compared to the average compact SUV.

In contrast, the trunk depth (distance from loading edge to floor) in the average SUV is 3.5 in or 180% greater than in the CX-5, meaning the CX-5 has a noticeably shallower installation depth.

The height of the trunk opening is the same; width (narrowest point +2.8 in / opening +3.5 in) and loading edge height (+0.8 in) are only slightly increased and below the 10% threshold.

Impact on Usability

The greater length of the CX-5 makes it more practical for long items (e.g., slats, furniture boards, skis) and for transport with folded or partially folded seats—longer cargo pieces fit more easily inside.

The significantly shallower trunk depth, however, limits usable vertical storage space: bulky, voluminous, or stackable cargo is harder to accommodate in depth, so the total volume may be smaller despite the length. A shallower loading well also means less strain when lifting heavy items in (shorter lever arms).

Conclusion: For long, flat, or elongated cargo, the CX-5 is clearly advantageous. For tall, stackable luggage or larger volume in depth, an average compact SUV offers better possibilities due to the greater trunk depth.