Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-5 vs Skoda Fabia

Key Differences

The Mazda CX‑5 offers significantly more loading length: with the seats folded down, the trunk is 11.4 in (21%) longer, and with the first row upright, even 8.7 in (30%) longer than the Škoda Fabia. At its narrowest point, the Mazda is also 4.7 in (13%) wider than the Fabia.

In contrast, the Škoda Fabia has a much greater depth between the loading edge and the trunk floor: +5.5 in (280%) compared to the Mazda. Additionally, the Mazda's loading edge sits 3.1 in (12%) higher above the road.

Impact on Usability

For long and bulky items (e.g., slats, skis, large suitcases), the Mazda CX‑5 has clear advantages: the greater loading length and the larger minimum width make it easier to load longer or wider cargo and increase the usable volume with the seats folded down.

When frequently lifting heavy loads or for easy loading and unloading, the Škoda Fabia scores points. Because its trunk floor is significantly lower and the loading edge is lower, the lift from the ground into the cargo area is less.

Combined, this means: due to the Mazda's 3.1 in higher loading edge and the Fabia's 5.5 in deeper floor position, the Mazda's trunk floor is approximately 8.7 in higher above the road — making lifting heavy items into the Mazda noticeably more strenuous.

Small, non-critical differences: the Fabia's trunk opening is 1.2 in higher (+4%), and the Mazda's opening width is 2.4 in larger (+6%) — both have only minor effects in everyday use and are below the 10% threshold.