Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-5 vs Skoda Karoq

Key Differences (>10%)

The Mazda CX‑5 offers significantly more usable length in the trunk with the first row of seats upright: it is 7.9 in (26%) longer than the Škoda Karoq.

The Karoq has a higher trunk opening: the opening is 5.1 in (16%) higher than on the CX‑5. The depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor is also significantly greater in the Karoq: it is 3.9 in (200%) deeper than in the Mazda.

Additionally, the loading edge of the Mazda sits 3.1 in (12%) higher above the ground than the Karoq.

Implications for Usability

The longer usable length of the CX‑5 with the seats upright makes it more practical for longer items when the seats are not folded down – such as slats, long boxes, or skis that need to be slid inside. Since the difference in the folded load floor is only 9%, the models are comparable with the seats fully folded.

The Karoq scores points in handling heavy or tall cargo: the lower loading edge combined with the significantly greater depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor means heavy items need to be lifted less high and can be recessed deeper into the trunk.

The higher trunk opening of the Karoq also makes loading tall items easier because there is more vertical clearance at the opening.

Width and opening width differ only minimally (each <10%), so wide or crosswise luggage fits similarly well in both models. In summary: for elongated cargo with the seats upright, the CX‑5 has the advantage; for easier lifting, deeper stowing, and loading tall items, the Karoq offers more practical features.