Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-5 vs Skoda Octavia Wagon

Summary of the Biggest Differences

Looking at the relevant dimensions, three differences stand out: The Škoda Octavia Wagon offers 5.1 in (14%) more usable length in the trunk with the rear seats upright than the Mazda CX‑5. Additionally, the trunk depth (distance from loading edge → trunk floor) is 2 in (100%) greater in the Octavia — meaning the cargo space sits significantly lower behind the loading edge.

Conversely, the loading edge of the Mazda CX‑5 is 4.7 in (19%) higher above the road.

What Are the Practical Implications of These Differences?

The greater usable length of the Octavia with the rear seats upright (14%) makes it more practical for transporting long, flat items without folding down the rear seats — such as skis, slats, or long boxes. In situations where the seats must remain occupied, the Octavia thus has a clear advantage.

The significantly greater trunk depth in the Octavia means that cargo lies deeper and is therefore somewhat better concealed and more stable in the cargo space. A deeper cargo area increases the volume below the loading edge and reduces the likelihood that bulky or tall items protrude over the loading edge.

Combined with the lower loading edge of the Octavia, this also provides an advantage when loading: items can be slid in more easily instead of having to be lifted.

The Mazda CX‑5 has a loading edge 4.7 in higher, which more often requires lifting heavy items and makes loading more cumbersome — especially for heavy furniture or boxes.

On the other hand, the differences in trunk width (narrowest point +2 in, opening width +1.2 in) and the slightly longer overall length with folded seats (±9%) are minor and only minimally affect everyday usability: the Mazda is somewhat wider at the narrowest points, which can make storing wider items easier in some cases.

Conclusion: For regularly transporting longer or taller cargo with occupied rear seats as well as for easier, less strenuous loading, the Škoda Octavia Wagon is more advantageous.

The Mazda CX‑5, on the other hand, offers marginally better widths at critical points but has practical disadvantages when loading and unloading heavy or tall items due to the higher loading edge and shallower cargo space.