Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-5 vs Skoda Superb Wagon

Key Differences

The Škoda Superb Wagon offers significantly more cargo length with the rear seats folded down: +16.9 in (25%) longer than the Mazda CX‑5. Additionally, the trunk depth (loading edge to trunk floor) is 1.2 in, or 60% greater in the Škoda.

On the other hand, the loading edge of the Mazda is 6.7 in (29%) higher above the road than the Škoda.

Impact on Usability

The greater cargo length of the Škoda with folded seats makes it noticeably more practical for long items (e.g., furniture, slats, long boxes) and increases usable cargo volume with the rear seat folded down.

The greater depth of the Škoda means more usable vertical space in the trunk, allowing bulky or tall items to be stored more easily upright or stacked.

The significantly lower loading edge of the Škoda also makes loading and unloading heavy loads easier; in everyday use, this means less effort and easier maneuvering with bulky items.

The Mazda’s higher loading edge results in more lifting effort when loading heavy or large luggage, whereas its slightly wider narrowest trunk width (no difference >10%) can be marginally advantageous for cross-loading.

In summary: For transport tasks involving long, tall, or heavy items, the Škoda Superb Wagon is the more practical choice. The Mazda CX‑5 may have advantages in other areas (e.g., off-road capability, seat comfort) but faces practical limitations in pure cargo handling due to the higher loading edge.