Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-5 vs Volvo XC60

Key Differences

Both models have the same trunk length with the first row of seats upright. When the rear seats are folded down, the Volvo XC60 is +3.1 in (≈5%) longer. The trunk opening of the Mazda CX-5 is +2 in (≈7%) higher, and the loading edge of the Mazda is +1.6 in (≈6%) higher above the ground.

The narrowest trunk width and the width of the trunk opening are each +2.4 in (≈6%) larger on the Volvo than on the Mazda. Noticeably larger is the depth of the Mazda's trunk (loading edge to trunk floor): it is +2 in greater — corresponding to a difference of around +400% compared to the Volvo.

Impact on Usability

The significantly greater depth in the Mazda means a noticeably deeper cargo well below the loading edge.

Practically, this means: more "recessed" storage height below the loading edge (better for bulky or voluminous items that need space in depth), but at the same time, loading and unloading heavy items is made more difficult by the higher loading edge (+1.6 in) because they have to be lifted higher.

The higher trunk opening of the Mazda (+2 in) makes it easier to load tall items through the opening height.

The Volvo scores with slightly more width at the narrowest point and a wider opening (+2.4 in each) as well as somewhat more length with folded seats (+3.1 in).

This makes it more practical for wide, flat, or longer loads that can be easily slid horizontally or turned through the opening. The lower loading edge height on the Volvo also makes lifting heavy items into the vehicle easier.

In summary: For low-lying, bulky loads and better use of the storage space below the loading edge, the Mazda is advantageous (especially due to the much greater depth). For wide, flat, or longer items and easier lifting of heavy loads, the Volvo is usually more practical in everyday use.