Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-5 vs VW Taigo

Key Differences

Two differences stand out: The depth of the trunk (distance from loading edge → trunk floor) is 5.9 in (+300%) greater in the VW Taigo, and the usable loading length with the first row of seats upright is 5.5 in (+17%) longer in the Mazda CX‑5.

Impact on Usability

The significantly greater trunk depth of the Taigo means the loading floor sits lower. This creates more vertical space inside the trunk, allowing taller or stacked luggage to be better accommodated without protruding over the loading edge.

However, a lower floor often requires lifting items higher over the loading edge when loading, which can make loading heavy objects more difficult.

The longer loading length of the CX‑5 with the first row of seats upright makes it more practical for long, flat items (e.g., skis, slats, long boxes) that you want to transport without folding down the front seats. Those who regularly carry long cargo have a clear advantage with the CX‑5.

The other differences (trunk length with folded seats +9% for the CX‑5, narrowest width +2.4 in, opening width +2.8 in in favor of the CX‑5, as well as about +0.4 in each in opening and loading edge height) are under 10% and only moderately affect everyday usability: the CX‑5 offers slightly more width and a somewhat larger opening for bulky items, while the small height differences only slightly affect handling.